Last updated
How to use the one rep max calculator
- Pick a hard set you did recently. A set of 2 to 10 reps that ended close to failure gives the best estimate.
- Enter the weight and the reps, then choose lb or kg and the exercise.
- If you stopped before failure, open More options and add an RPE. An RPE of 8 means you had about two reps left, and the calculator counts those reps too.
- Select Calculate 1RM.
You get your estimated max, the answer from each of the seven formulas, training weights from 100% down to 50%, and a set of warm-up weights. The calculator uses the Epley formula unless you pick another one under More options.
Rounding is on by default, so training weights land on loads you can build with real plates: the nearest 5 lb or 2.5 kg. You can switch it off under More options. Your lb or kg choice is saved on your device for next time.
What is a one rep max (1RM)?
Your one rep max is the heaviest weight you can lift once, through a full range of motion, with good form. If you can lift it twice, it wasn't your max. It is the standard yardstick for strength in the bench press, squat, deadlift and overhead press, and it is the number most strength programs are built on.
Programs rarely ask you to lift your max. They ask for a percentage of it: five sets of five at 80%, a heavy triple at 90%, speed work at 60%. Without a 1RM, those percentages are guesses.
There are two ways to find it. You can test it by working up to a true single, which is tiring, needs a spotter and carries more risk. Or you can estimate it from a set you have already done, which is what this calculator does. An estimated max is often written e1RM.
1RM formulas explained
Every 1RM formula does the same job. It takes the weight you lifted and the reps you got, and predicts what you could lift once. The seven formulas here were published by different coaches and researchers between 1985 and 1994, each working from their own data, which is why their answers differ. In the equations, w is the weight lifted and r is the number of reps.
Epley (1985)
1RM = w × (1 + r ÷ 30)
The default here and in most lifting apps. It adds about 3.3% to the weight for every rep. It traces back to a poundage chart that strength coach Boyd Epley put together for athletes at the University of Nebraska.
Brzycki (1993)
1RM = w × 36 ÷ (37 − r)
Published by Matt Brzycki. It matches Epley exactly at 10 reps. Below 10 reps it runs a little lower, and above 10 it climbs faster.
Lander (1985)
1RM = 100 × w ÷ (101.3 − 2.67123 × r)
Tracks Brzycki closely across the whole range. The two usually land within about 1% of each other.
Lombardi (1989)
1RM = w × r0.10
A curve instead of a straight line. It runs high on short sets and low on long ones: at 3 reps it gives one of the highest estimates, and by 12 reps the lowest.
Mayhew et al. (1992)
1RM = 100 × w ÷ (52.2 + 41.9 × e−0.055 × r)
Built from bench press data on college men and women. The curve flattens as reps rise, so it handles longer sets more gently than the straight-line formulas.
O'Conner et al. (1989)
1RM = w × (1 + 0.025 × r)
The same shape as Epley with a smaller step of 2.5% per rep. It gives cautious numbers, which some lifters prefer for setting training weights.
Wathan (1994)
1RM = 100 × w ÷ (48.8 + 53.8 × e−0.075 × r)
Another curved formula, from the textbook Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. You will also see the name spelled Wathen.
Average of all seven
Averaging evens out the quirks of each formula. Pick it from the Formula menu under More options if you would rather not bet on one equation.
Worked example: 225 lb for 10 reps
Say you bench 225 lb for 10 reps. Epley gives 225 × (1 + 10 ÷ 30) = 300 lb. Brzycki gives 225 × 36 ÷ (37 − 10) = 300 lb. The other five formulas land between 281.3 and 303.2 lb, and the average of all seven is 294.8 lb.
| Formula | Estimated 1RM |
|---|---|
| Epley | 300 lb |
| Brzycki | 300 lb |
| Lander | 301.7 lb |
| Lombardi | 283.3 lb |
| Mayhew | 294.6 lb |
| O'Conner | 281.3 lb |
| Wathan | 303.2 lb |
| Average of all 7 | 294.8 lb |
In kilos, 100 kg for 5 reps gives 100 × (1 + 5 ÷ 30) = 116.7 kg with Epley.
How accurate is a 1RM calculator?
Accurate enough to plan training with, as long as the set is short and hard. The seven formulas never agree exactly, and the gap between them grows quickly once a set goes past 10 reps. Here is the spread for a 225 lb set.
| Reps | Lowest | Highest | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 reps | 238 lb | 256 lb | 18 lb |
| 5 reps | 253 lb | 268 lb | 15 lb |
| 8 reps | 270 lb | 287 lb | 17 lb |
| 10 reps | 281 lb | 303 lb | 22 lb |
| 12 reps | 288 lb | 325 lb | 37 lb |
| 15 reps | 295 lb | 368 lb | 73 lb |
From 3 to 8 reps the formulas stay within about 18 lb of each other. At 12 reps the gap is 37 lb, and at 15 reps it reaches 73 lb. That is why the calculator warns you above 12 reps.
Research points the same way. Studies that checked these equations against maxes lifters actually tested found them most accurate for sets of fewer than 10 reps. A 1997 study of seven formulas also found that all of them came in low for the deadlift.
A few things move your result:
- How close to failure you went. If you had reps left and don't add an RPE, the estimate will be low.
- How you train. Lifters who practice heavy singles often beat their estimate. Lifters with a lot of endurance often fall short of it.
- The lift. Estimates tend to be closest for the bench press and can run low for the deadlift.
- Your technique. Reps with a shorter range of motion than you'd use for a real max inflate the number.
Treat the result as a range. If two formulas say 295 and 305 lb, your max is about 300.
How to use your 1RM in training
Most programs set the weight for each workout as a percentage of your max. These are typical ranges that coaches use. The numbers in your own program come first.
| Goal | % of 1RM | Reps per set |
|---|---|---|
| Max strength | 85% to 100% | 1 to 5 |
| Strength and muscle | 70% to 85% | 5 to 10 |
| Muscle endurance | 50% to 70% | 12 to 20 or more |
| Speed and technique | 50% to 70% | 1 to 5 fast reps |
The percentage table in your results does this math for you. For any other percentage, use the one rep max percentage calculator. For a table you can print and take to the gym, see the one rep max chart.
Some programs, such as 5/3/1, base their percentages on a training max set at 90% of your true max, so that every rep stays crisp. If your program says so, multiply your 1RM by 0.9 first.
How the warm-up sets work
The warm-up table climbs from light to heavy while the reps drop, so you practice the movement without tiring yourself out: about 40% of your max for 8 reps, 55% for 5, 70% for 3, 80% for 2 and 90% for a single. Rest a minute or two after the light sets and three to five minutes before the heavy ones. For barbell lifts, no warm-up weight goes below the empty bar.
How to test a true max safely
You don't need to test a real one rep max to train well. If you want to anyway, stack the odds in your favor.
- Have a few months of steady practice with the lift first. If you are new, use the calculator instead.
- Use a spotter for the bench press, and set the safety bars in a rack for the squat.
- Do the warm-up sets. Never jump straight to a heavy weight.
- Take small jumps near the top, and stop when a rep turns into a grind or your form changes.
- Rest 3 to 5 minutes between heavy attempts and keep it to two or three of them.
- Skip the test when you are hurt, sick or short on sleep.
This site gives general fitness information, not medical advice. Check with a doctor before lifting heavy if you have an injury, a heart condition, high blood pressure or any other health concern. Read the full disclaimer.
One rep max FAQ
How do I calculate my one rep max?
Take a weight you can lift for 2 to 10 reps, divide the reps by 30, add 1, and multiply by the weight. That is the Epley formula: 1RM = weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30). For 185 lb for 6 reps, 185 × 1.2 = 222 lb. Or enter the set in the calculator above and it runs all seven formulas for you.
If I can bench 225 10 times, what is my max?
About 300 lb. The Epley and Brzycki formulas both give exactly 300 lb for 225 lb for 10 reps. The other five formulas range from 281.3 to 303.2 lb, and the average of all seven is 294.8 lb. A max somewhere in the 280s to low 300s is a realistic expectation.
What is 80% of your 1 rep max?
Multiply your max by 0.8. For a 300 lb max, 80% is 240 lb. For a 140 kg max, it is 112 kg. Most lifters can do about 7 or 8 reps at 80%, which makes it a common weight for sets of five. The percentage table in your results lists 80% along with every step from 100% down to 50%.
How much should a 150 lb guy bench?
There is no official number, and what's normal depends on how long you have trained. As rough guideposts, someone new to lifting often starts around half to three-quarters of bodyweight (75 to 115 lb), a year or two of steady training commonly brings a 150 lb man to about a bodyweight bench (150 lb), and experienced lifters may reach 1.25 to 1.5 times bodyweight (185 to 225 lb). Age, arm length and training history all move those numbers, so compare yourself with your own past lifts first.
Which 1RM formula is the most accurate?
None wins everywhere. Epley and Brzycki are the most widely used. They give the same answer at 10 reps and differ by a few percent on shorter sets. In a 1997 study that tested seven formulas against real maxes, only the Mayhew and Wathan equations matched tested bench press maxes closely, and only the Wathan equation did for the squat. If you can't decide, use the average of all seven.
How many reps should I use for the best estimate?
Two to five reps is the sweet spot, and anything up to 10 works. The set should be hard, with no more than a rep or two left. Above 12 reps, conditioning matters more than strength and the estimate gets shaky.
Is a calculated max the same as a tested max?
No. It is a prediction, and a good one when the set is short and hard. Your real max on a given day also depends on sleep, technique, nerves and how much practice you have with heavy singles.
How often should I recalculate my 1RM?
Whenever you set a rep record, or every 4 to 8 weeks at the end of a training block. You don't need a special test day. Enter your best recent set.
Does the calculator work for dumbbells and machines?
The math works for any lift, but the formulas were built on barbell lifts like the bench press, squat and deadlift. Expect rougher estimates for dumbbells, machines and small isolation exercises. For dumbbells, enter the weight of one dumbbell and read the result as a per-hand number.
What does the RPE box do?
RPE is a 1 to 10 rating of how hard a set was. A 10 means you couldn't have done another rep, 9 means one more, and 8 means two more. If you enter an RPE below 10, the calculator adds the reps you had left before it runs the formula. The RPE calculator has the full chart.
Sources
- Brzycki M. Strength testing: predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 1993;64(1):88–90.
- Epley B. Poundage chart. In: Boyd Epley Workout. Lincoln, NE: Body Enterprises; 1985.
- Lander J. Maximums based on reps. NSCA Journal. 1985;6(6):60–61.
- LeSuer DA, McCormick JH, Mayhew JL, Wasserstein RL, Arnold MD. The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1997;11:211–213.
- Lombardi VP. Beginning Weight Training: The Safe and Effective Way. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown; 1989.
- Mayhew JL, Ball TE, Arnold MD, Bowen JC. Relative muscular endurance performance as a predictor of bench press strength in college men and women. Journal of Applied Sport Science Research. 1992;6(4):200–206.
- Mayhew JL, Johnson BD, LaMonte MJ, Lauber D, Kemmler W. Accuracy of prediction equations for determining one repetition maximum bench press in women before and after resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2008;22:1570–1577.
- O'Conner B, Simmons J, O'Shea P. Weight Training Today. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing; 1989.
- Wathen D. Load assignment. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994.